Yesterday's question was what Chair Kevin Warsh would say about December. The answer, delivered at 2:30 p.m. ET on Wednesday, was: nothing. The Federal Reserve held its target range at 3.75%–4.00% in a 10–2 vote, with two officials dissenting in favour of a quarter-point hike, and Warsh said he does not support signalling policy decisions in advance. This morning brought the data he said the committee was waiting for — and it hardened, rather than softened, the case for a December hike. Headline PCE inflation rose 0.5% in September and 3.6% over the year, core PCE rose 0.3% and 3.1%, and third-quarter GDP grew at a 3.4% annualised pace. Bitcoin, which had reclaimed $81,000 on Wednesday, traded near $80,100 on Thursday morning, down about 1.4%, after dipping to roughly $79,600. The morning's gains are gone. The December question is not. General information only — not financial advice.
The decision itself surprised nobody: a Reuters poll of 100 economists had 94 expecting a hold, and markets had priced it at about 90%. What mattered was the shape of it. The statement upgraded the committee's view of economic activity from "solid" to "strong," repeated that inflation "remains elevated," and said more information would help determine the appropriate stance. Governor Lisa Cook and Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack both dissented, preferring a quarter-point increase — two votes already in favour of the move markets expect in December. Warsh, at his fourth meeting as chair, then refused the guidance the market wanted, said the Fed would not prejudge meetings, and added a structural change: from 2027, seven of the eight annual meetings will set policy and one will be devoted to broad strategy with no rate vote; in 2028, six will set policy and two will focus on strategy.
Markets read the package as a hawkish hold with a dovish delivery. Stocks rose modestly after Warsh began speaking — the S&P 500 and Nasdaq each up 0.2%, a third straight session of small gains — while the dollar slipped, with one analysis noting the December hike was already priced at about 80% before the meeting and the part the market wanted, a signal about what follows December, was refused. Pricing after the meeting still put a December hike at roughly 80% to 87% across reports. In other words, the hold changed nothing about December, and the two dissents plus the "strong" activity upgrade arguably made a hike more, not less, likely. Warsh's own summary of the wait — the next six weeks will be "information rich" — pointed straight at this morning's data.
This morning's numbers landed almost exactly where forecasters expected, which is precisely why they matter. The PCE price index, the Fed's preferred inflation gauge, jumped 0.5% in September, the biggest monthly increase in six months, taking the yearly rate to 3.6% from 3.4%. Core PCE, which strips out food and energy, rose 0.3% on the month and 3.1% on the year, up from 3.0%. Both were in line with Wall Street Journal survey expectations, according to MarketWatch and Barron's. GDP, released at the same 8:30 a.m. ET slot, grew 3.4% annualised in the third quarter, above the 3.2% forecast and up from 2.2% in the second quarter.
Put together, the two releases describe the combination the Fed least wants: growth running strong while inflation accelerates away from its 2% target, driven in large part by higher energy prices — oil has traded above $100 a barrel since early October, and WTI was near $101.90 on Thursday morning. An in-line hot print does not shock markets the way a surprise would. It confirms them. It confirms that the committee that just voted 10–2 to wait will walk into its December 9 meeting with inflation at 3.6%, core at 3.1%, growth at 3.4%, and two of its own members already on record wanting a hike in October. That is the December case, hardened by data rather than by rhetoric — and it leaves the "what follows December" question, the one Warsh refused to answer, still open and still the one that will move markets when it is eventually answered.
Wednesday's story was crypto joining an Asian tech rally. Thursday's is crypto following a tech selloff down. South Korea's Kospi fell 1.2% as Samsung Electronics dropped 4% despite a record quarterly profit, disappointing investors on shareholder returns. Nasdaq-100 futures fell 1.1% after Alphabet missed earnings expectations — search advertising grew at its slowest pace in five quarters, YouTube fell short, free cash flow was negative $9.1 billion, and the company disclosed more than $1 trillion in future obligations — while Microsoft rose after beating estimates. In crypto, ether lost about 1.7%, the CoinDesk Memecoin Index dropped 3.4%, AI-linked tokens were among the hardest hit, and Solana slipped to around $100, briefly trading below it. Liquidations across Binance, Bybit and OKX totalled $205.8 million over 24 hours. Gold held near $4,040 and the 10-year Treasury yield near 5.02%.
The backdrop beyond earnings is not helping risk appetite. The Wall Street Journal reported, via Dow Jones coverage, that the U.S. has told several Gulf states to prepare for a short, intense military campaign after the November 3 midterm elections, with Middle East tensions already keeping a lid on sentiment. Treat that as a reported claim, not a confirmed plan — but it is part of why oil stays above $100 and why a hot inflation print lands harder than it would in a quiet month. The market has three triggers in six days — the Fed, the GDP/PCE data, the midterms — and two of them have now pointed the same way: tighter for longer.
Against that, the ETF flow picture improved for a third straight day and still tells a narrow story. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs took in $137.3 million on Wednesday, according to Farside Investors data reported by CoinDesk, bringing the three-session total to $423.7 million after $110.3 million on Monday and $176 million on Tuesday. But Wednesday's inflow ran almost entirely through BlackRock's IBIT ($136.01 million), with $1.32 million into Bitwise's BITB and every other fund at zero. That is narrower than Tuesday, when two funds shared the inflow, and narrower still than a broad institutional bid. Ether funds, meanwhile, saw about $21 million in outflows, according to the morning's market data.
Three inflow days totalling $423.7 million is a genuine change in sequence after October's selling — but concentration is the caveat that has followed every step of it. One fund carrying a whole session's inflow, while ether bleeds and altcoins take the brunt of the selloff, describes defensive positioning into Bitcoin, not a rotation into risk. The Fear & Greed Index sat at 51, neutral, in the morning's data — no panic, no euphoria, a market waiting. What would change the reading is breadth: a fourth inflow day that spreads beyond IBIT, ether flows turning positive, and Bitcoin holding $80,000 through the rest of a week that still has the ECB decision today and the midterms on Tuesday. Until then, the $80,000 line has now been crossed in both directions five times in nine days. Each reclaim in a quiet session has been followed by a give-back when the next headline lands. Thursday is the latest example.
First, whether Bitcoin holds $80,000 into the weekend after giving back $81,700 — the level, not the reclaim, is the signal, and the moving-average stack now sits overhead, with the 7-, 20- and 50-day averages all above the current price. Second, ETF breadth on the next print: does a fourth day spread beyond IBIT, and does ether stop bleeding? Third, the ECB decision this morning and the November 3 midterms, which the market is already treating as a policy fork for the CLARITY Act. And fourth, December pricing: it sits near 80–87% for a hike, but Warsh has now made clear he will not pre-announce it. The next six weeks of data — November's inflation and jobs prints included — are the guidance. Watch the data, not the press conferences, because the chair just told the market that is all it is going to get.
A hold with two hike dissents is not a December decision, an in-line hot PCE print is not a shock, and three inflow days totalling $423.7 million through essentially one fund are not a broad institutional turn — let alone a trend change in a month where Bitcoin is still down about 4% and U.S. spot demand, on CryptoQuant's measure cited yesterday, had been negative every day since October 14. The numbers in this story are morning snapshots from the sources cited; prices move, and the afternoon session can confirm or erase the morning. We publish the flows, the votes, and the levels so you can judge which it does.
Sources, all checked this morning: the Fed decision, 10–2 vote, dissents, statement language and meeting-calendar change via Admiral Markets (citing the Federal Reserve), AsiaToday, FactSnap and Binance News; Warsh's no-forward-guidance position and "information rich" remark via FactSnap, Binance News and Barron's; PCE and GDP actuals and forecasts via MarketWatch, Barron's, Investopedia, KuCoin and CoinEdition; December hike pricing via Reuters reporting, CME FedWatch via Morningstar, and Mitsubishi UFJ analysts via Binance News; Bitcoin, ether and Solana prices and ranges via CoinDesk, CoinGecko data via Crypto Times, Finnhub and the morning market report; ETF flows via Farside Investors data reported by CoinDesk and TradingView, with the fund-by-fund split via ad-hoc-news; the Samsung, Alphabet and Microsoft earnings moves via CoinDesk, Investopedia and Kenny Polcari; liquidations, market-cap and Fear & Greed readings via TokenPost and the morning market report; the Gulf-states report via Dow Jones Newswires as carried by Morningstar. Our earlier coverage — Fed Decision Day: Bitcoin reclaims $80K, Bitcoin slips below $80K as the Fed meeting opens, and Bitcoin's $80K line faces its real test — is the rest of this week's story.
Nova's Data Lab tracks live prices and scanner signals across the market — free to browse, no account needed.
Open the Data Lab →